| HP pavilion dv6500t versus Panasonic ToughBook | | | | screen display, size, and resolution, and i was a |
| 51 | | | | little inpresses here, and there. The HP has a 15.4 |
| But why is it that whenever i see a laptop a | | | | in TFT active matrix screen display, but i think it |
| laptop notebook, and i fall in love with the view, | | | | lagged behind wehn compare with the resolution |
| but on reaching the part where i check out the | | | | of Panasonic Toughbook. The Panasonic |
| features, i get disappointed. The difference | | | | Toughbook is not bad at all either, check out this |
| between the HP pavilion versus the Panasonic, will | | | | specs for the confirmation of what i am saying: |
| soon be clear, after i take a minute rest. | | | | the Panasonic ToughBook 51 uses an Intel Core |
| Alright, there we go, the HP pavilion is very | | | | Duo 1.66GHz processor, RAM of 512MB, and |
| beautiful and attractive, and it is well designed, | | | | 60GB HDD. |
| unlike the Panasonic which look like a war laptop | | | | I dont love Windows XP pro much, although it s |
| notebook. But are laptop computers needed in | | | | good, but not my taste. It runs on the WIndows |
| war? Anyway, that's for Panasonic to answer. | | | | XP Pro platform. The screen display is a bit |
| Another difference between the HP pavilion | | | | smaller in smaller, you wont feel it, but when you |
| versus Panasonic, is that the HP has a faster | | | | view movies, you will discover what i am telling. I |
| speed, not so fast, but faster than the Panasonic. | | | | like the Panasonic whe i watch movies because, it |
| It has more hard disk space and it is lighter than | | | | is very bright, and it has no screen reflection. |
| the Panasonic Toughbook. Check out some specs | | | | Its reaolution is 1600x1200 which makes it better |
| for HP pavilion dv6500t: It uses an Intel Core 2 | | | | than HP pavilion. |
| Duo (1.8 GHz) processor, with a 1 GB DDR II | | | | Another impressing feature is that it has a lasting |
| SDRAM, and 80GB HDD. | | | | battery life, for about 6.0 hours of continuous use. |
| I was impressed about the weight when i | | | | It also impressed me with its WLAN, memory |
| compare the two, the HP pavilion versus | | | | card reader, and PC card slot. ALthough i lacked |
| Panasonic, the HP was actually lighter (6.2 lbs), and | | | | features like Bluetooth, and a bit heavier when |
| i also love Windows Vista, and fortunately for HP | | | | compared with HP. In short, both laptops are |
| it uses a Microsoft Windows Vista, Microsoft | | | | wonderful, except for ... |
| Windows Vista Home Basic. I also compared the | | | | |